HI, On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:56:29PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I think the idea of a policy summary document is good; I agree with James Blessing's suggestion that it might be better to institute it as a set of pointers to existing documentation rather than repeating text from other documents. Also it should be made clear that this is a summary rather than a statement of policy in itself, so that we do not end up with potential discrepancies due to multiple documents making statements on the same issues. I.e. we should strive towards policy atomicity.
As far as I understand, this document is to *replace* the existing IPv4 policy documents. Eventually, with a formal PDP, after the initial round(s) of discussion and improvement. So there wouldn't be anything else to point to. Looking forward to a lively discussion on Thursday :-) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279