Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)

James Blessing wrote:

Why 640

I had the same question. But I think I found the answer: 640 = 512+128 = 5*/25 = 5*/(5*5). The magic number 5 is between 4 an 6. It suggests that it is more than IPv4, but it is not IPv6 yet. Janos (sorry for possible duplicates, I first posted from the wrong e-mail address)