Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
a) Everyone gets one (and only one) fixed size block, as described in 2008-06
apnic chose this path, i believe for the following reason you state:
I think it is important to think about new companies. They will very probably require some IPv4 address space during the transition from IPv4 to IPv6. I think the whole community will be in a lot of trouble if we make a policy that makes it impossible for new entrants to participate in a dual-stack world.
Andreas Schachtner <Andreas@Schachtner.eu> wrote:
IMHO, the "one size fits all" approach doesn't seem the right way to go.
you're right, of course. but the problem is, nothing will fit all. we are out of ipv4 space. concepts such as meeting needs of existing players are now pretty much irrelevant. randy