On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Gert Doering wrote: [..]
I think it would make sense, to have "full-weight" LIRs that automatically get a /32-or-bigger allocation, and possibly "light-weight" RIPE "customers" (to get the contractual stuff that is desired) that get a /48-or-so PI.
Just as a rough outline - details to be worked out.
The outline sounds good to me, you have my support (though of course show details first ;).
My support to. Could maybe make it as easy as to have different fee and some too strict definition of what is full and light. full = can justify /32 with /200 customers (yeah I know it's that 200 rule...) light = everyone else, even if you can justify a /32... the fee atleast 50% lower than the above.
And it is *MUCH* better than the current proposals which are simply going to waste address space.
It is then also very simple "become member, pay fees, justify space requirement, get it, done presto"
Also that avoids any need for ULA-C as everybody is covered. Now if only the rest of the RIR community was able to understand that point.
we'll get there after a while:) -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger@jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------