On 08/09/2014 04:08, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:
It seems clear that we can't reach consensus on removing it completely, so I'm hoping for your support. Let's take baby steps so we can get at least some progress?
yep, agreed.
The wording does not refer to route6 objects, only inet6num objects. The part about "globally routeable" refers to 2000::/3 so that people don't try to advance fc00::/7 or fec0::/10 address space (for example) as "theirs."
In that case it would probably be advisable to refer to IANA designated Global Unicast address space rather than "globally routable": http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space
Our intention was to allow assignments by other LIRs or NIRs or whatever as well as RIRs.
It's not clear what you mean here. Are you talking about provider independent direct assignments - which are exclusively assigned by NIRs and RIRs, or PA assignments - which are exclusively assigned by LIRs? The proposal only makes sense for direct / PI assignments, not PA assignments. Nick