10 Jul
2015
10 Jul
'15
4:12 p.m.
Hi Mathew,
I'll note that both authors' LIRs (uk.mod and de.kaufland) already hold an IPv6 /29 allocation each...so assuming the proposal was intended to help scratch an itch of their own, so to speak, perhaps this is simply an omission?
It was our (uk.mod's) expectation/assumption that it would be possible to return an existing allocation (in an 'unused/as-new' state) and apply for another under the new criteria.
That is correct. If you return your allocation you can then do a new first-allocation request. With the current text it won't be possible to grow an existing allocation though, as that would use the rules for additional allocations. Cheers, Sander