On 11/03/2013 12:47, Gert Doering wrote:
Dear AP WG members,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:46:03PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-02, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. [..] You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 18 March 2013. Let me remind you again that we need your explicit voice of support if you want to see this proposal implemented. (If you do *not* want that, an explicit voice of opposition would be helpful, too).
"No response" is making our lives as WG chairs somewhat difficult - it will lead to "extention of the review period", and then after some more months to "asking the proposer to drop the proposal due to lack of support"...
I'm worried by the wooliness of phrases such as "The Originating LIR and the IPv4 address space transferred are in compliance with the Originating Policy" I really don't know what this means and I see a world of pain unless it's clarified. What does "in compliance with" actually mean in this context? Nigel