7 Aug
2011
7 Aug
'11
7:21 p.m.
On 8/7/11 2:29 PM, Jasper Jans wrote:
I support this proposal.
+1 This just means we remove the need to lie anymore to IPRAs about multihoming, if small/medium organization wants their IPv6 block and do not plan to actually be multihomed. :) Actually, with this we remove the only reason why NAT66 could exist :) Get your PI and don't translate addresses, if you change provider you are still good. Cheers, Jan Zorz