Hello Per,
The only argument in favor of changing policies at this stage is IMHO to, if possible, be able to dodge accusations of anti-competitive practises against new entrants.
That is indeed the concern that I have.
All that is required for that is to reserve a relatively small block from which everyone who qualify for a /32 or larger PA v6-block gets for example a /22 v4-block if they have no prior v4 allocation.
Such a policy would solve my main concern. I would remove the reference to IPv6 because earlier parts of this discussion showed that we don't want to put IPv6 requirements in IPv4 policy. I think just reserving a block like this for initial allocations would be enough.
Everything else that has been suggested are policy tweaks which aim to benefit certain types of operators, but they make no significant difference to the bigger picture.
It seems more and more people are happy with the current policies and don't want to change them for the final /8. Would a simple policy like Per suggests be acceptable for everybody? Thanks, Sander