Re: [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2

michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:

The point is that if RIPE changes the policy, it has to do so in a way that does not convert the bad luck of running out of IPv4, into selective discrimination.

Or, better, in a way that does not cause the bad luck for foreseeable future, which is possible by reducing amount of address allocation assuming extensive use of NAT and start working on using Classes E and part of D for unicast. Note that NAT can be end to end tranparent. Masataka Ohta