26 Nov
2009
26 Nov
'09
2:51 p.m.
On 26 nov 2009, at 14:48, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Lutz Donnerhacke
I still reading this draft and try hard to find the benefit over announcing more specific routes in 2002::/16.
Can you please hit me into the right direction?
RFC 3068. Modern client applications will prefer using IPv4 over IPv6 to connect to remote servers, if the local systems' IPv6 address is within 2002::/16. Even when behind IPv4 NAT.
Doesn't seem to be a problem in running 6rd since it's all designed to keep running IPv4 instead of IPv6. Groet, MarcoH