On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com> wrote:

It's also worth noting, perhaps, that in the APNIC region both
allocations and assignments appear to be capped at a /22. 2012-04
proposes capping PI at a /24, which I suppose may further diminish
concerns that allowing PI in the first place will make the last /8 go
away too quickly. On the other hand, limiting PI at /24 but PA at /22
would still cause the effect of forcing organisations to become LIRs, if
the organisation's requirement cannot be fulfilled with a /24 only.
That's kind of pointless, if the only assignment they'll ever make as
LIRs is to their own organisation. So I think it would be even better if
we did like APNIC did and capped both PI and PA at a /22 - that way, all
the internet organisations in the region gets to have life rafts of the
exact same size. (But perhaps they should be equally priced also...)