11 Aug
2013
11 Aug
'13
8:29 p.m.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 03:45:22PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote:
But if they have to pay a price that reflects the relative scarcity of the resource they have a much stronger incentive to conserve that the alternative situation you describe. "Commercials" cannot simply provide all the addresses their customers want when they cannot replenish their stock without paying a rising price.
We are talking about 1,75 € per address and per year. I guess this wouldn't stop any commercial from reselling to a client who asks for it, and certainly can pay for it, if conservation is abandonned. Best regards, Sylvain