Hi Iljitsch,
When is this BoF?
I’ve worked in policy proposals to solve this problem in several RIRs, so I fail to see what further problem do you find.
Anyway, happy to participate and contribute if there is one.
Regards,
Jordi
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> en nombre de Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Fecha: domingo, 6 de mayo de 2018, 21:12
Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: [address-policy-wg] IP/ASNs for Governments BoF
I'd like to call your attention to a BoF that was added to the schedule last week:
IP/ASNs for Governments |
Please also note my (relatively) new affiliation. :-) However, I'm using my old email address here to avoid even more spam.
The idea behind this BoF is that governments (and some other very large organizations) find it useful to number all their sub-organizations from a single large block, but these sub-organizations connect to the internet independently. We've done this with the Dutch government-wide IPv6 numbering plan, which provides IPv6 addresses to the national government, but also provinces and cities. In Germany there's also a similar IPv6 numbering plan.
However, the RIPE policies don't fit this use case very well. We believe it would be useful to start a discussion with the community to see how this is best addressed.
There's also some issues surrounding the use of public AS numbers for very large private networks.
I haven't been on this list for a number of years, so if all of this has been discussed recently, my apologies.
The full BoF proposal is here:
Iljitsch van Beijnum