Hello Gert,
--
appreciate your response, i do believe that you started to care when something is dead now trying to bring to life! On most replies here are only shooting on newcomers/lirs in which no new lir is getting more than a /24, and nobody is talking for those lirs that have multiple resources /16, /17, /20, /21, /22 etc, in which you can clearly see that there is no usage of it by theirself but only leasing/renting them out to those who cannot effort to be LIR and even if they effort it, cannot get more than a /24 allocation. There must be a policy in which it will stop those behaviours of LIRs, if you don't need that much of resource, then return it simple as that, and prevent them from leasing out to people like us. I was working as an IT in one of University in which it has a /16 allocation, and only in use less than a /24, all remaining resource is leased out with monthly fee of course. Of course, if you check every single University in the world has min /15, /16 allocation what for? There are many countries like ours in which IPv6 is nowhere implemented yet, and there are many applications in which is not yet ready for IPv6. So therefore, i hope that this would be considered.
Cheers.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:46 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Albanian Hosting SH.P.K. via address-policy-wg wrote:
> Very interesting! Good catch. And thank you for the information provided, i
> personally believe that there is no help as because nobody cares at least
> not the RIPE NCC itself. I do believe that we all are wasting our time
> here, as long as my small company need a /22 allocation and cannot get it,
> it's worthless. We are renting them from others in order to survive!
If you have read this thread, you might have noticed that people *do* care.
It's just not very clear what can be done, at this point in time, which
will have a positive effect.
There's lots of things that can be done that have negative effects
(like, etra bureaucracy, which increases costs, which then leads to
complaints about, well, bureaucracy) but have very little effect on
the problem statement: networks getting "more than one /24" for the
same entity.
The problem statement is not as clear cut as it might seem... if a parent
company opens a new subsidiary in every european country, which has their
own network, budget, CEO... shouldn't they be entitled to have a LIR
account and a /24 for each subsidiary?
... and, of course, it's not like we haven't been telling people since
15+ years that IPv4 is going to run out, and they should use IPv6.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
