Hi everybody, I have asked Filiz to extend the discussion period for this proposal, because there have been *no* comments in the last round - but the proposal itself was changed, and as such, I can't just declare "consensus" or "no consensus" here. Please give us your input on whether you think the proposal *as written right now* is a good thing to have. regards, Gert Doering, Address Policy WG Chair On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:02:32AM +0100, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
PDP Number: 2006-02 IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy
Dear Colleagues
The Discussion Period for the proposal 2006-06 has been extended until until 19 March 2007.
This proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria and the End Site definition in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy".
You can find the full proposal at:
http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html
We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>.
Regards
Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279