-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-17, at 15.33, Jon Lawrence wrote:
Now, this is another argument *altogether*, not a reason to start counting internal assignments. If we want to discuss whether rewording the 200 customers rule needs tuning, let's discuss that.
Agreed - I was just wondering if anyone remembered why the 200 rule came into being in the first place. The documentation clearly states 200 end user sites. So I'd interpret that as meaning that internal assignments didn't count.
Which I am arguing is silly. We want IPv6 deployment to take off, right? So let's set the threshold for getting blocks fairly low. There is already a price on IPv6 blocks, the LIR fee. The 200 sites/end-users/customers/whatever does not make much sense. We are all even using fairly divergent specs for what the requirement is. And I don't remember it from the top of my head. However, I would argue that 200 assignments (internal, external, whatever you want) is enough. It's a measurement we have fairly good grip on by now. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNM9nqarNKXTPFCVEQJ0vACeMyf8pn3MCKOHZT0076rL1vzrh88An0LB rgIYdV5omq+OFA3Qs7/vB9Xw =ABb2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----