11 Jun
2016
11 Jun
'16
9 p.m.
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, NTX NOC wrote:
What does community thinks about it?
People have looked into this before. It's not feasible, not enough client OSes support it. People even tried this in the IETF, lots of years ago: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-savolainen-indicating-240-addresses-01 IPv4 stone is blead dry. Even if we doubled number of IPv4 addresses by means of some unknown magic, it wouldn't buy is any significant amount of time. The solution is IPv6. There is no other way to fix this. Direct your energy in that direction. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se