22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
1:20 p.m.
This of course does not stop someone like ISC using a chunk of their existing address space to provide anycast service for dlv.isc.org (or whatever). IMO, it's up to the DLV cheerleaders to make the case that their zones are "important" enough to deserve special anycast allocations.
Your example is essentially saying there is no barrier for a holder of an anycast address block, to offer more than one anycast service from that block. I think that address policy should be addressing that general case of an anycast network services provider rather than dealing with various special cases of applications that require anycast network services. --Michael Dillon