Hi, I do not know if this is the right place. If not please direct me to the proper location to "vote" for this proposal. I support this proposal and thus: I say +1 for the proposal. With kind regards, Stefan van Westering SoftTech Automatisering B.V. Op 20 okt. 2016 om 12:29 heeft Gert Doering <gert@space.net<mailto:gert@space.net>> het volgende geschreven: Hi, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:24:12PM +0300, Ciprian Nica wrote: I oppose both policies. For 2015-04 it's obvious, a policy that is supposed to arrange my hair nicer would make me bold. You either do a cosmetic reorganisation or important changes which should never be added just like that, as some changes are minor and shouldn't be discussed (but in a different policy) As for 2016-03 I think we should set our goals right. Isn't everybody saying that IPv4 is dead for over 4 years already ? Isn't everybody saying that the only way forward is to IPv6 and exhausting RIPE's available pool sooner would help people move to IPv6 ? Please do NOT mix comments to different policies into an e-mail that has a Subject: that says "2016-03". This makes it MUCH harder for the chairs to go back to the mail archives later on and see who said what regarding a specific proposal - and then, if I cannot remember "oh, there was a comment about 2015-04 in a 2016-03 thread", you're going to complain that I have ignored your comment. Right? Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279