Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

Hi Jan,

I'd actually be interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre million times of the entire IPv4 space.

Giving significantly more than a single /64 to a single (home) user is part of the way IPv6 was designed. A /48 was a standard size from RFC 3177. It's successor RFC6177 is the current BCP. When working according to that BCP a /32 and even a /29 is really not that much. If you don't agree with an RFC/BCP then this is not the place to deal with that... Cheers, Sander