On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Niall O'Reilly wrote: <snip>
I'ld really like to see a conclusion (for or against, I don't care) about ULA-C which didn't involve religious convictions. That probably belongs in another thread.
I am in favour of ULA-C and I belive we have a very good use-case for it where I work, but, there is a huge but there. Without global DNS, that is possibility to have reverse DNS for our ULA-C addresses it is completly useless for our cause. And with DNS you get into other complication and in the end you get something called ULA-C which ain't too different from PI space at all. So my conclusion on this is quite simple, it would be nice to have ULA-C but I dont belive there is any point it wasting time on it anymore. Get a decent PI policy in place that let those that need IP addresses get it and we're done. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger@jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------