fixed that I am against abuses. I think we have to keep in mind that
RIPE task is resource distribution not holding them in a drawer.
A patent is useful when registered, detailed described and made
public so that anyone can understand the benefit and re-do the same
following patent istructions.
Not in a drawer. It becomes a rich business when you can make it
available to the market at a so resoanable (sometimes not) price a
that people don't need to build up it themself.
I hate the guys whos eyes are rolling with dollar symbol when they
see a new business opportunity: speculators.
I love people that when find a new business are entusiat to do
business with it 'cause it solve a problem or makes life easier and
better and they can make money with it.
I don't think policy 2015-01 will save IPv4 and I don't think it is
its purpose.
I don't think this will make someone richer and someone else poorer,
that's a market thing.
I like it in its simpleness: just an alignement.
Transferred IPs have to be holded 24 months... with 2015-01 *all*
transferred IPs have to be holded 24months that's it.
"Simple and clean" as considered by Gert ad RIPE69 listeing to
proposal.
In the past someone chated the system with fake address plans "I
need more address space"
Now someone cheats the system with fake "I need a new LIR"
I can't see any difference in this and to me 2015-01 looks fair
enough.
am with Sebastian
>I agree but currently I don't have a good idea what else to do that
>will not interfer with normal LIR operation(s).
About "must deploy IPv6" I remeber you that IPv6
allocation requirement has been just removed from /22 IPv4 requests.
Acceped march 2015: 2014-04, "Removing IPv6 Requirement for
Receiving Space from the Final /8"
You don't even need an IPv6 address space to ask for IPv4 /22
Now remember that RIPE task is to distribute resources and think
about it.
task: distribute resources. ARIN has almost reached the task don't
you think?
Another point:
Acceped april 2015: 2014-05 Proposal Accepted (Policy for Inter-RIR
Transfers of Internet Resources)
Please note the "Arguments Opposing the Proposal" It may reintroduce
needs justification to the RIPE region [...]
Finally
I think the policies are going the right way.
This won't stop speculators or fix everything but is trying to save
the task of distributing resources in a bottom - up fair way (read
as approved from the community)
Standing on me I finally decided study better IPv6 and understand
its market problem and I will try spend some work in that direction
next months.
Even if 17 years old he's still a teen and see a couple of market
problems in it.
From RIPE70 i decided to go this way and I'll get in touch with IETF
and try to put some ideas in and see if something can help.