On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny@danysek.cz> wrote: <snip>
Reserve in last /8 is quite enough to cover future requirements for very long term and there's no need to block address usage in other /8 managed by RIPE NCC. Your proposal simply creates additional blocked and efectivelly unused address space in other /8 just due to the policy. RIPE NCC is here for address distribution to end users. I'm just using arguments of Remco now - addresses should be used, not reserved for something surreal.
I think you might missed the same fine point I did... RIPE NCC can still return addresses to IANA and those addresses will not fall in under the /8 rule? -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no