Le mercredi 27 mai 2009 à 18:36 +0200, Jeroen Massar a écrit :
Frederic wrote:
we do not support this proposal and we would garant routing for min ipv6-PI block assignement.
RIPE NCC cannot guarantee anything regarding routing.
yes we know. but we suggest that may be a good rule to write somewhere that it's ask to LIR to garant routing. so we do not support this 2009-06. because this confirm to let choice for operator so it let choice to not garant routing. bst regards. Frederic.
You need to communicate with the rest of the parties where you want your prefix to go if they want to accept it or not.
Please see: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-policies.html#routability (see section 4.2. Routability Not Guaranteed in RIPE-466) As mentioned in the text of the proposal.
Clearly there is a lot of confusion about this, thus, as I mentioned in my other mail, the text can be amended by removing those statements, but then there should definitely be a clear link to the above document.
Greets, Jeroen