On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:47 PM, NTX NOC <noc@ntx.ru> wrote:

I oppose this proposal too.

1) it limits in rights all new LIRs. As I told in previous discussions
LIR stats show the same rate of new LIR registration (250-300 LIRs avg)
per month. It's about 40% of 185 is free and that means it will be about
7000 new LIRs in it. That will be enough for 2 years, and after RIPE has
reseved space and reserve pool that could not be used for (as I remember
2 years) and another IPv4 space will be given to market.
So there are enough space for 4-6 years with current situation.

False. This proposal does not change when space can be used.

2) RIPE here is not to limit abilities of the members to use IPv4
space. RIPE should give opposites. ISPs will take care about all others.
But in current case RIPE take part in business significant
parts and that's not good.

False. The proposal will not limit the abilities of the members to use IPv4 space.

3) Those policy add new fields and statuses to the database. And this is
not good too. System should stay simple and useful. It's not good
direction to make it more complex because there are a lot of question to
current one system.

This is the only one of your objections that has some merit.

Jan