Hi, On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:11:56PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
As we see some people decided to ignore others who want to tell their opposition opinion and welcome those, who agree. I thought the RIPE NCC is community, expressing all people position. But I was wrong.
In general, we don't ignore voices opposing a proposal. In this particular case, when we aim to make particular behaviour more uninteresting, it is expected that people that make a profit from this particular behaviour will not like the change - we do hear the arguments, but "I want to keep doing what the rest of the community considers abusive, because I make a profit from it!" is not a very strong argument here. If everyone else would just shrug their shoulders and say "well, we don't care", such opposition would be sufficient - but if there are strong voices in favour of going ahead, the WG chairs needs to make a judgement - and we will, at the end of the review phase, and explain to the group why we decided. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279