I support Aleksey's opinion (NOT this proposal). <br /><br />Why address -policy -wg doesn't tell anything about little influence  of transfers on the system?<br /> <br /><br />11:23, 9 июня 2015 г., Aleksey Bulgakov &lt;aleksbulgakov@gmail.com&gt;:<br /><blockquote>-1<br /> I cannot support this proposal.<br /> There were the calculation was showing little part of transfers from the last /8. <br /> Also this proposal doesn't close multiple accounts<br /> 09 Июн 2015 г. 11:01 пользователь "Riccardo Gori" &lt;rgori@wirem.net&gt; написал:<br /><blockquote>  Support +1<br /> <br /> regards<br /> Riccardo<br /> <br /> Il 11/05/2015 13.43, Marco Schmidt ha scritto:<br /> <br /> <blockquote> Dear colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2015-01, "Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01/draft We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 9 June 2015. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC  </blockquote> <br /> <br /> -- <br /> Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori@wirem.net  part1.04050103.07050807@wirem.net   <br /> <br /> </blockquote><br /> </blockquote><br /><br />-- <br />Отправлено из мобильного приложения Яндекс.Почты