16 Sep
2012
16 Sep
'12
5:12 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:52:11PM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
IPv4 PI was never meant for that, but more for enterprises in order to be able to multihome. That luxury times are over and I think that the policy should reflect that.
that would be the LIR-centric view. However, I understand the intention of the LIR system for the LIRs to be resource-management organisations rather than a club with exclusive access to resources. Therefore an end-user is no less "entitled" to IP resources than a LIR and 2012-04 in current form is arbitrarily discriminationg. rgds, Sascha Luck