Hi, Shane Kerr <shane@ripe.net> wrote:
Did we want "status:" added?
It sort of comes under the policy as it is specified there, too. Regards, -leo
-----Original message----- Subject: [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46 To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net From: Hans Petter Holen <hpholen@tiscali.no> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 01:39:45 -0100
Dear WG;
Here are some items for a draft agenda, please send me comments as soon as possible;
- wg-charter - policy process - PI policy - initial IPv4 allocation size - RIR- IANA relationship and procedures - RIPE-152 Charging by local registries - Final revised IPv4 policy
-----End of original message from Hans Petter Holen-----
-- leo vegoda RIPE NCC Registration Services Manager