I'm in favour of this policy Maybe we should change the sentence "Cumulatively, no more than 248 additional IPv4 addresses may be assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in section 6.10." Into something like "Cumulatively, an PI assignment will not reach beyond the next /24 boundary from the motivated need. This might thus result in an PI assignment of more than one subnet of which each subnet is a minimum of a /24". (p.e. a /23, /24 when a need of ~ 520 IP-addresses is motivated). With kind regards, ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema KPN IP-Office +31 70 45 13398 kpn-ip-office@kpn.com -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] Namens Emilio Madaio Verzonden: donderdag 21 oktober 2010 13:37 Aan: policy-announce@ripe.net CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size) Dear Colleagues, Following the feedback received at RIPE 60, the proposal 2006-05 was taken over by a new proposer and a new version was produced. The draft document for the new version of the proposal has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html and the draft document at: http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2006-05.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 18 November 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC