22 Apr
2016
22 Apr
'16
6:13 p.m.
On 22/04/16 16:05, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Regarding the current allocation policies, you still have not addressed the query that several people have raised about why it is better to shut off opportunities for future internet service market entrants than it is to make things marginally easier for a small segment of the existing market for a short period of time, other than "but it hurts".
Nick I think this has not been expressed directly, but IPv6 implementation obligations in this policy might be the reason why it could be MUCH better than existing policy who offers the opportunities for future entrants but does not have a long term solution for the real problem (IPv4 exhaustion).