9 Oct
2019
9 Oct
'19
9:01 a.m.
In message <a5331a3f-e773-4e14-8080-6ca39a0342d6@www.fastmail.com>, "Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN" <ripe-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, at 07:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 block, specifically.
Probably a less specific.... When a less specific is splitted for transfer...
Sorry. You lost me. I thought that we were discussing something that had been -aggregated-, not split. Did I misunderstand? Regards, rfg