18 Sep
2012
18 Sep
'12
5:50 a.m.
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 00:18 +0200, niels=apwg@bakker.net wrote:
* marcin@leon.pl (Marcin Kuczera) [Tue 18 Sep 2012, 00:05 CEST]: <snip>
Clear point of view, I like it !
I don't think the point of the policy is to punish people for having addressing needs.
Completely agree! A temporary addressing need seems much less motivated than a permanent addressing need. Jim made it simpler: We can (and should, then) discuss the temporary assignment policy as a whole. Best, Martin