8 May
2012
8 May
'12
10:01 a.m.
On 5/7/12 7:34 PM, Remco Van Mook wrote:
<all hats off>
Alright then, for the sake of argument I'll oppose until I see some convincing numbers. Back in the original last /8 discussion the rationale for choosing a /22 was that it would get us about 16k final allocations, or 1 for every NCC member and room for the membership to double in size. Now, we have a number of new realities:
So, when we hit the last /8 policy, all those who will then need IPv4 space *must* become an LIR even if one /24 PI would fulfill entirely their need? Not sure everyone appreciates that, specially not small companies or even start-ups :) Cheers, Jan