On Sunday 17 April 2016, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> I seriously liking the idea of some APNIC colleagues "no more v4
> policy from today on".
that was my proposal. the sitting apnic address policy chair went into
bureaucratic insanity and drowned it.
Hoesntly, I think it is best companion policy goes alone with the last /8 policy, as we all know and expected people would love to come back propose to get the last piece of free pile eatted now instead of in few years.
V4 are not like guns, someone holding it won't cause danger to anyone. And we don't really dealing with abuse in the policy, and we don't have any v4 left to distribute.
So why we need further policy proposal regarding something that policy can not manage, control, distribute, so what for?
The policy exists at start mostly for fair distribution, book keeper job so internet can function, now distribution job is done, book keep only requires transparency and easy for anyone update their record honestly without worrying anything, that's how we get best registry job done.
we could try it here.
randy
--