* Leo Vegoda:
On 16 Jan 2008, at 18:56, Florian Weimer wrote:
* michael dillon:
- No PI assignments via LIRs. LIRs only manage PA IPv6. - special membership in RIPE with an annual fee for PI holders
How do you handle lack of payment? Reuse the prefix? That seems like a bad idea to me.
If this is a bad idea...
I would also see a mandate to keep current address information, including legal details (register of companies number etc.) in the WHOIS database. RIPE NCC will investigate cases if proof is presented that something is wrong in the database (bouncing email, non-working phone number, bouncing snail mail, lack of matching entry in the register of companies).
... then what is the enforcement mechanism here?
The same as above. This would be an additional process, on top of the yearly fee, not a replacement.
You've just defined a system where the RIPE NCC will guarantee the uniqueness of address space for a one-time fee *and* allow registrants to remain anonymous after the first 12 months. I can see a definite market for something like this.
We already face the problem that LIRs are somewhat pseudonymous. There's no easy way to determine which LIR controls which address blocks.