Hi, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
PDP Number: 2007-05 IPv6 ULA-Central
Dear Colleagues
The Discussion Period for the proposal described in 2007-05 has been extended until 9 July 2007.
As the IETF is re-addressing this issue at the moment, I suggest that until they are done re-analyzing and coming to a conclusion that this submission is frozen till that work is done and completed.
There are various suggestions already that it might be very possible that IANA directly will provide this service. Next to the more likely result that ULA-C won't even exist due to the many concerns raised already by various operators in the community.
Please FREEZE this proposal till all that work is done.
i second that - quite useless at the time being. That's also a reason i didn't comment on the proposal itself. To get that straight: I do like the fast track on proposals, but this one is a little to premature. ...and on a sidenote: following the various threads on various mailinglists, i - for me - came to the conclusion, that i don't like the idea of ULA-C myself anyways. I will be happy with ULA and "PI". -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================