* marcin@leon.pl (Marcin Kuczera) [Tue 18 Sep 2012, 00:05 CEST]:
On 2012-09-17 18:59, Martin Millnert wrote:
[Devils advocate] Why must there be special treatment for conference-space (temporary assignments) at all? Why can't conferences run NAT-something+IPv6 like the rest of everything? Since networky-conferences are the most common requesters of these temp-blocks in the first place by my understanding, wouldn't that be an excellent place to start adapting to the future rather than getting special treatment and sticking to the old?
Couldn't this help with dissipating clue to real networks, etc?
Just a thought.
Clear point of view, I like it !
I don't think the point of the policy is to punish people for having addressing needs. -- Niels.