Hi, been there, done that :-) When RIPE started, we invented an elaborate series of documents with a 'proper' naming scheme. Trust a physicist (me) and a computer scientist (Daniel) to come up with a scientifically correct solution. This lasted for less then two years, after which we went to the current scheme. It took me only a week or so to go through all the archives and rename documents, and update references. As they say, l'histoire se repete toujours :-) Rob On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Dmitry Burkov wrote:
On 24.11.10 22:38, Remco Van Mook wrote:
Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe- doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential confusion, anyway. The confusion is that, for the next 25 years or so, people will be wondering what the relation is between ripe-<foo> and ripe-doc-<bar> documents. Which one replaces which other one?
So again, please don't. Agreed, as don't see any real needs and only future problems.
Dmitry
Remco
This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.