17 Sep
2012
17 Sep
'12
9:36 p.m.
On 17 Sep 2012, at 17:59, Martin Millnert wrote:
Why can't conferences run NAT-something+IPv6 like the rest of everything?
Let's avoid this rat-hole. The issue is whether there should be temporary assignments or not. Whatever the justifications are for (not) having these or other approaches to solving those issues simply don't matter. The question here is simple and needs no refinement or qualifications. They just complicate matters and don't help. Should there be temporary assignments? Yes or no. My personal preference is to burn through all the remaining IPv4 space as quickly as possible in the (probably forlorn) hope that it puts an end to these angels on pinhead debates. :-)