10 Sep
2012
10 Sep
'12
5:02 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:30:10PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
i can not speak to the intent in the ripe region. but the principal intent of the final /8 policy in the apnic region was so that *new* entrants could get one small piece of the pie.
This was also the original reasoning here in the RIPE region.
If so, the letter of the policy contradicts this - there is no mention of only "new" requestors, rather any LIR that can demonstrate a need will be assigned one last /22. One could reasonably assume that the intention has then failed in the original policy and is not a valid argument against the proposal... rgds, Sascha Luck