Because in some regions the policies, that have been developed by the community say so. I don't agree with the existing definitions of critical infrastructures, but I respect the policies developed following the PDP. If we don't agree with that point, then we should propose policy changes thru the PDP, but not make a useless critic. It is just my opinion, of course. Regards, Jordi
De: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Responder a: <global-v6-bounces@lists.apnic.net> Fecha: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:45:31 -0400 Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> CC: <ppml@arin.net>, RIPE Address Policy <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>, APNIC IPv6 <global-v6@lists.apnic.net>, "IPv6 in Africa <afripv6-discuss@afrinic.net>" <afripv6-discuss@afrinic.net> Asunto: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
On Jun 22, 2007, at 11:17 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
RIRs can be considered, and in fact they are, critical infrastructures,
Why?
Rgds, -drc
_______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list global-v6@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.