27 May
2009
27 May
'09
6:36 p.m.
Frederic wrote:
we do not support this proposal and we would garant routing for min ipv6-PI block assignement.
RIPE NCC cannot guarantee anything regarding routing. You need to communicate with the rest of the parties where you want your prefix to go if they want to accept it or not. Please see: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-policies.html#routability (see section 4.2. Routability Not Guaranteed in RIPE-466) As mentioned in the text of the proposal. Clearly there is a lot of confusion about this, thus, as I mentioned in my other mail, the text can be amended by removing those statements, but then there should definitely be a clear link to the above document. Greets, Jeroen