16 Feb
2012
16 Feb
'12
10 a.m.
On 2/16/12 1:27 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 16/02/2012 00:12, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Yesterday. I see 2011-04 more as a vehicle to buy us three more bits to fix the additional allocation policy mess hopefully in time before folks need more than a /29, and that's why I don't oppose it. :-)
If the HD ratio requirements need to be changed, they can be changed - but it ought to be done separately to this proposal. Let's not create a messy workaround for a different problem.
Totally agree. Who's interested in working on this separate policy change proposal? We can meet in Ljubljana RIPE meeting in April and see how we can proceed. Cheers, Jan