Hi Sander, El 16/09/2014 10:27, Sander Steffann escribió:
Hi Daniel,
I think there should be common rules for all WG and specific rules to each WG who needs it. Some WG could be OK with the common rules while another WG could need specific ones due to their work.
We tried to come up with common rules and couldn't find anything that worked for all working groups. Therefore we decided to let each working group make their own rules. Remember that there is no central authority. In the end it are the participants in the working groups that decide how they want to work together. As chairs collective we just try to coordinate and do what's best for our working groups. (I hope this also answers Nick's question) What I mean with common rules? P.E. For being WG Chair proposed you need some knowledge, being part of the WG for "X" time, know the processes in RIPE, you cant stand up just another one need to promote you....
Those examples can be valid for all WG since there is no specific questions about it. Then, for this WG, should be specific rules about IP Resources, policies, etc... Regards, -- Daniel Baeza Centro de Observación de Red Dpto. Red y Sistemas Television Costa Blanca S.L. Telf. 966.190.847 | Fax. 965.074.390 http://www.tvt.es | http://www.tvt-datos.es Correo: d.baeza@tvt-datos.es -- [Atención] La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial, privilegiada y está dirigida exclusivamente a su destinatario. Cualquier revisión, difusión, distribución o copiado de este mensaje sin autorización del propietario está prohibido. Si ha recibido este e-mail por error por favor bórrelo y envíe un mensaje al remitente. [Disclaimer] The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for its addressee. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error please delete the original message and e-mail us. (!) El medio ambiente es responsabilidad de todos. Imprime este mail si es absolutamente necesario.