On 27 Jun 2007, at 00:41, Jeroen Massar wrote:
See the various other discussions about ULA-C
I have, and I'm disappointed by what seems to me, on both (all?) sides to be a combination of hidden agendas, prejudice, grandstanding, and refusal to acknowledge that the opposing argument may even be made in good faith.
and the amount of questions that have been raised and remain unanswered and start tapping into that and answering them, then we can proceed with that part. Upto now those questions remain open and as such there actually is not even a real case at all why such space should exist, except for some people wanting to have "really cheap PI" space for vaguely defined examples.
And that case can be solved by what Gert proposed, thus then there really is no need any more for ULA-C.
Simply repeating your opinion isn't going to convince me that it has a real basis. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly University College Dublin IT Services PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9