Hello, I am sorry, I should say that some people definitely misinterpreted my words. And probably not only mines I definitely declared that I still think that no concensus was reached. I am not sure that I want to spend time to fill a formal appeal, however, may be. Thanks for your considerations, Géza On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg <immo.ripe@be.free.de
wrote:
Gert wrote:
Looking at all the messages that have been posted in the discussions following my e-mails, I categorize your feedback as follows: [...] - statements of "we do not have consensus" (Immo Wehrenberg, on the assumption that consensus has to be unanimous Remco Van Mook)
I'm afraid I have to correct you here. I said that I'm not sure wether we have consensous or not and i would follow Gezas opinion on that. Since Geza has not objected that consensous is reached, I assume that we have consensous now.
Just a clarification, sorry that I did not make this clear in the first place.
Immo