Hi Philip, there is "Under the current policies, when this proposed policy is triggered, the RIPE NCC will no longer assign ASSIGNED PI and ASSIGNED ANYCAST space." right now at the proposal page. I (and not only me) mean after the policy is in power, RIPE NCC will stop assign PI/ANYCAST at all. I can imagine why it can be with PI, but why ANYCAST? ;) Philip Smith написав(ла):
Hi Max,
The proposal has *never* been about PI, ever. Alain and I were requested to include specific wording to that effect. So we did. :-)
Best wishes,
philip --
Max Tulyev said the following on 7/07/10 20:36 :
Hi All,
I see the policy proposal now deny PI at all. Why?
Those who requsted PI (through us) usually are not so big to become a LIR and request /20. They even don't need it. By this proposal, you will stimulate small companies become a LIR and get /22 instead of for example /24 PI.
For my point of view, there should not be a difference between PA and PI distribution in the policy. Better is to make some actions to allow de-aggregate prefixes to more than /24. Then those who need /29 will ask for /29, not for /24 PI (now) or even /22 PA (if 2010-02 will be in power).
Emilio Madaio написав(ла):
PDP Number: 2010-02 Allocations from the last /8
Dear Colleagues,
The text of the policy proposal 2010-02 has been revised based on the community feedback received on the mailing list.
The draft policy document and the impact analysis for the proposal have also been published.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html and the draft document at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2010-02.html
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 4 August.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
-- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)