* Sascha Luck:
On Monday 08 May 2006 06:28, Florian Weimer wrote:
In the latter case, a rather significant fee is needed to turn global inconvenience into a local one.
An arbitrary fee, specifically designed to block someone's entry into *any* market, is *illegal*, at least in any non-communist country that I know.
Have a look at frequency auctions and how they are used to lock out competition from small players. Many drastic measures are completely legal.
I also don't understand the whole decision circling back, endlessly, to restrictive policies when nobody actually seems to want IPv6 (assuming this is still what we're talking about)
The majority of those who post on the RIPE mailing lists deeply fear that there is a real demand for IPv6, so much that their routers are overloaded. I don't know why.